Begin to translate an activity from the mankind generally, especially since the character translates an activity, never interrupt to the interpreter's research. Come as what translate mobile climax every time, the interpreter studies with respect to incline to development, the controversy in translating research also with respect to all the more intense. This is no wonder. The focus of latter argument was what artistic view and science watch to contend for. The core of the problem is differ to the opinion of scientific view. Cognizance interpreter is scientific with the two cliques that are not science each hold one aspect of the matter, but unavoidable each have break biased. This is divided among them right " science " outside understanding difference, the mainer problem that still depends on holding science to advocate interior it seems that. The issue that concerns now talks about the view that nods us.
Is the interpreter artistic? It is artistic! Must apply a language to be modelled afresh with respect to translator only textual in already modelled the figure that give and character, the interpreter ought to be artistic. This is above criticism. But, the interpreter cannot be artistic merely, because " in artistic world, no matter be the artistic figure of which kind of configuration,be the life fountainhead that is oneself with social life, the essence that reflect the life with vivid perceptual form " ' . Of translator " life " fountainhead still depends on origianl work in. Even if is literary interpreter, the understanding of interpret former times to origianl work also cannot by straight feeling, random is developed. This among them even language of have the aid of, logic goes understanding correctly. Besides, the interpreter is translated besides literature outside, still include translation of science and technology, political comment interpreter is waited a moment. Of course, there also is creation in this kind of interpreter, but we are unapt still OK and absurd arrive or be to say this kind of interpreter is not an interpreter, or be the room for action that says a large number of this kind interpreters are art! Accordingly, no matter be literary interpreter, or it is interpreter of science and technology, or the interpreter of other sort still always should tell bit of science. About this problem, mr Dong Qiusi is in " the construction that regards interpreter theory " already had in one article elaborate. As to " the interpreter learns " formulation home is in early this century 10 time, or it is some earlier moment already had had, be not what what say like somebody is " import " ' .
After this, make the progress of much more relevant course, this among them especially lingustic development, make an interpreter consider to be explored along scientific way development. Close just a little 10 years, broad interpret learns loudly appeal to the public, loud cry to build an interpreter by worker, made indefatigable effort, undertake large-scale, beneficial exploration. Interpret bound is numerous the scholar learns to send to building an interpreter with great expectations, many scholars also pay Zhu Jian laborious for it. This kind of monograph, talk a large number of emerge in large numbers only, present a splendid sight, but, this on one hand research work often is people place to misunderstand. Should say, study working itself also is put in a few not quite perfect place, the course in making this still is in be pregnant with meets with time and again person censure. This must cause our attention.
Previous12 Next